Can Minority Languages Be Saved? Globalization vs. Culture http://www.omniglot.com/language/articles/minority_languages.phphttp://www.omniglot.com/language/articles/minority_languages.pdf
by Eric Garland
The increasing mobility of people, goods, and information has driven a powerful trend toward cultural uniformity and the extinction of local languages. But languages that have young people, business, and government on their side are alive and thriving.
Globalized economics and media are changing the face of culture around the globe, reducing the number of languages that humans speak. As the world economy becomes more integrated, a common tongue has become more important than ever to promote commerce, and that puts speakers of regional dialects and minority languages at a distinct disadvantage. In addition, telecommunications has pressured languages to become more standardized, further squeezing local variations of language.
Over the past 500 years, as nationstates developed and became more centralized, regional dialects and minority languages have been dominated by the centrist dialects of the ruling parties. Cornish has given way to English, Breton to French, Bavarian to High German, and Fu-jian-wa to Cantonese. Linguists concur that minority languages all over the world are giving way to more dominant languages, such as English, Mandarin, and Spanish, among others. The realities of commerce and the seductive power of world pop culture are placing pressure on speakers of minority languages to learn majority languages or suffer the consequences: greater difficulty doing business, less access to information, etc.
These pressures are inducing a rapid die-off of languages around the world. Languages have been disappearing steadily, with 3,000 of the world's languages predicted to disappear in the next 100 years. According to the United Nations Environment Program, there are 5,000 to7,000 spoken languages in the world, with 4,000 to 5,000 of these classed as indigenous, used by native tribes. More than 2,500 are in danger of immediate extinction, and many more are losing their link with the natural world, becoming museum pieces rather than living languages.
Futurists have noted this loss with no little despair, for significant, culturally specific information may disappear along with a language. For instance, knowledge about unique medicines and treatments used by aboriginal groups could be lost forever if the language used to transmit that information is banned by a majority culture.
The common wisdom is that globalization is the wave of the future, and in many respects this is undeniable. However, swept up in this conventional wisdom is the notion that languages and cultures will simply cease to exist, and people will instead choose "global" cultures and languages that will transcend boundaries.
An extremely interesting article that sheds light on an issue that many of here should be aware of.
endymion-- 11-19-2007
Is Fujian-wa the Cantonese for Ban Lam Gu? If it is, I speak quite a bit of it. And I don't think it is really endangered, outside of China that is. In the mainland, I'm not quite sure, but here in the Philippines and many places in SEA, it's quite alive. Though the trend has been for Fujianese migrant children to learn Mandarin not Cantonese
Sano- 11-21-2007
Is Fujian-wa the Cantonese for Ban Lam Gu?
I really don't know. I just hope that an effort is made to prevent these types of things from happening.
endymion-- 11-22-2007
What types of things? I only recognize Fujian in the compound, which is that province. The language is known here also as Lan nang oe.
Sano- 11-22-2007
What types of things?
The near extinction of minority languages.
Steve the Pirate- 12-06-2007
While having diverse languages can be a good thing, I think that the world's major languages will eventually win out over the smaller ones. Even if people try to save the minority languages, the major ones will continue to grow.
I doubt that we will all end up speaking the same language, but a few will take over.
Sano- 12-06-2007
I doubt that we will all end up speaking the same language, but a few will take over.
You mean like, Egyptian, Latin, Greek...?
Language evolves and changes far too often for any generalization to be true.
Steve the Pirate- 12-06-2007
I didn't mean any specific current language, but some languages are growing, and displacing or killing off smaller languages as they gain more speakers. Eventually, I think, most of the world will be speaking just a few major languages. It doesn't matter what these languages are, but they'll take over.
The Peloric Orchid- 12-06-2007
Would it be effective if the conlanging community could rally up people to learn dying languages? I would gladly learn some. I just can't find sources, or have the money needed to use them (9th grade budget REALLY stinks...)
Ghadan- 01-01-2008
Would it be effective if the conlanging community could rally up people to learn dying languages? I would gladly learn some. I just can't find sources, or have the money needed to use them (9th grade budget REALLY stinks...)
I'm sure that the conlanging community would embrace the idea, and a few of them would probably incorporate some of the dying languages' feature into their own conlangs. But for their influence to go outside that small community, they would have to document the language well. This includes making books, PDFs, audio files, websites with lessons...anything that would increase the chances of curious minds finding some information. Even if the world ends up being dominated by a select few languages, there will be a sizable amount of people still interested in what was spoken beforehand.
The best source, especially for endangered/dying languages, would be native speakers of those languages. Ubykh, a now dead language (the last native speaker died in 1992), still has a lot of interest, and the few materials and resources that are available on it are well-known. Anyone who's serious looked into Ubykh is aware of Tevfik Esenc's famous recording.
eldin raigmore- 01-02-2008
Would it be effective if the conlanging community could rally up people to learn dying languages? I would gladly learn some. I just can't find sources, or have the money needed to use them (9th grade budget REALLY stinks...)I kind of doubt it; the reason is that as far as I know the record number of languages for a single individual is thirty-ninelanguages, but there are about four-thousand to six-thousand languages. Even if we only look at the languages that have at least 10,000,000 speakers there are seventy-eight of them; a person wouldn't have time to learn more than half of those. It would take one-hundred to one-hundred-fifty Mithridates-level polyglots to learn all the world's languages.
There are "good" reference grammars for about two thousand languages. Field linguists are busily trying to write reference grammars for the rest of them, but there are one or two languages which have never been studied for each one which has been adequately studied.
chicken-pot Wy- 01-02-2008
Those interested in pursuing a degree in linguistics can find many positions available to those interested in studying and preserving dying languages.
Here is an example: http://www.ling.pdx.edu/childs/DKB_Web/Mn_DKB_ResearchAssistant.html
Click the 'Methods' link for a view of the faces of language death.
In reality there really is very little that can be done, in my opinion, to save endangered languages other than for people to adopt them and use them.
Money really isn't so much an issue, and throwing money at the problem can actually hurt. For instance as the Irish govt has worked to develop the Gaelthacht regions of the country, the development itself has simply brought in more English speakers!
Ghadan- 01-06-2008
Less seriously, see this link.
When I first saw your post, I for some reason didn't notice the "less" in "less seriously", and started reading those advertisements as real ads. But I then thought that using Greek letters for P.O boxes seemed odd, in addition to some of the names and the term "deflator morpheme." :)
In reality there really is very little that can be done, in my opinion, to save endangered languages other than for people to adopt them and use them.
Problem is, in order to get around lexical/grammatical hurdles that occur as a result of lack of documented grammars/living native speakers, awkward or blatantly incorrect translations will eventually be made, which changes the language.
Forumer™ is Voted #1 Free Forum Hosting provider
Build your own community today with the largest message board hosting company.