http://kjzz.org/news/specialreports/2008/elections/selectacandidate
Yesterday my top four were Clinton & Obama tied for 1/2, and Edwards and Giuliani tied for 3/4.
Today they are Edwards, McCain, Obama, and Romney, tied for 1/2/3/4.
I don't know what I did different.
My bottom four, today as yesterday, are Thompson (4th from bottom), Gravel (3rd from bottom), Huckabee (2nd from bottom), and Paul (dead last -- I get a zero correlation with him (don't agree on anything).) I think yesterday I had Huckabee above Gravel, but the bottom four are pretty consistent today compared to yesterday.
I tried again at
http://www.kuow.org/elections/selectacandidate.asp
This time I got Edwards, Clinton, Obama, and Huckabee as the top four -- no ties.
The bottom four were McCain, Hunter, Thompson, and Paul.
I really don't know what it proves, except that I really don't want Ron Paul to become President this year.
Anyway, nationwide, it looks like:
Obama has the lead at 13%;
Clinton, Thompson, & Edwards are in a three-way tie for 2nd/3rd/4th place at 12%;
and Kucinic and Hunter are tied for 5th/6th at 10%.
Of course as the site itself points out, their sample has no scientific claim to being representative.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDIT:
OK, I tried it again at
http://www.wvtf.org/news_and_notes/elections.php
and this time I got:
Clinton and Obama tied for 1st/2nd;
Edwards 3rd;
McCain & Romney tied for 4th/5th.
The bottom ones were:
Ron Paul in last place;
Hunter & Thompson tied for 2nd/3rd from last;
Giuliani 4th from last.
I guess I'm "undecided".